Growth and Evolution of the UK Structured Products Market
The UK structured products market has experienced high levels of sustained growth over the past five years, underscoring its increasingly important role in investor portfolios. As a result, annual issuance has climbed from 355 products in 2020 to a total of 866 products in 2025. This reflects heightened demand for defined outcome solutions and an increase in product provider activity. This steady upward trajectory, more than doubling since 2020, highlights the market’s resilience through volatile macroeconomic conditions and its evolution into a mainstream component of the UK investment landscape.
Data for this article is taken from FVC’s structured products analytics platform, Structured Edge (www.structurededge.co.uk). The platform provides whole of market coverage and draws on years of experience and data to deliver a clear and reliable view of overall market activity and product characteristics. All data is for the 10 years up to 31 December 2025.
| Year | Total Number of UK Products |
|---|---|
| 2020 | 355 |
| 2021 | 449 |
| 2022 | 713 |
| 2023 | 793 |
| 2024 | 822 |
| 2025 | 866 |
10 Year Performance Trends and Maturity Outcomes
Structured products in the UK have shown consistently strong performance over the past decade, with many product maturities delivering positive returns. The figures below highlight the resilience, even during turbulent periods such as 2020 when markets fell, volatility increased and more plans finished returning capital only. Even under such circumstances loss outcomes remained very limited. From 2016 to 2025, average annual returns stayed within a steady range of 3.78 to 7.93%, reflecting a consistent positive performance. The sharp rise in maturities from 2021 onward suggests increased activity and supportive markets, while the low incidence of losses highlights the emphasis on capital protection and well-designed payoff structures.
| Name | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of maturities | 252 | 464 | 258 | 274 | 205 | 536 | 635 | 632 | 675 | 685 |
| Positive return | 242 | 459 | 256 | 261 | 139 | 493 | 625 | 620 | 667 | 684 |
| Exactly capital | 7 | 4 | 2 | 10 | 50 | 38 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 1 |
| Loss | 3 | 1 | 3 | 16 | 5 | 2 | ||||
| Average annual return (%) | 6.33 | 7.93 | 7.41 | 5.99 | 3.78 | 6.32 | 6.53 | 6.82 | 7.41 | 7.66 |
Autocall Structures In 2025: Behaviour, Variations and Return Profiles
Autocalls continued to dominate the UK market in 2025, maintaining their position as the most widely issued product type. The popularity of the products was driven by a combination of demand for defined outcomes and the appeal of regular opportunities for early maturity.
Within the Autocall category we will define four distinct sub-types, each defined by the performance conditions required for early maturity. Autocalls are linked to one or more underlyings, for multiple underlyings the call condition is dependent on the performance of the worst-of. A Hurdle Autocall has at least one Autocall level in excess of 100% and the remainder no lower than 100%. A Level Autocall we define has all levels equal to 100%. The other two variations allow for levels below 100% to increase the chance of calling. We divide these into Defensive Autocalls which have at least one level below 100%, and Step Down Autocalls which also have a level below 100% and more than two distinct Autocall levels, for example 100%, 95% and 90%.
These variations allow products to be tailored to different market conditions and investor preferences.
Hurdle products were the smallest contributor to 2025 maturities, with 110 in the 5 year and 121 in the 10 year periods. This strict hurdle condition typically delays autocalling, so a higher proportion of Hurdle products reached their final observation dates in 2025 compared with the other structures. Despite this, their returns remained the highest of all categories, consistently around 10-12% per annum for at-risk versions.
| Name | Last year | Last 5 years | Last 10 years |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of maturities | 30 | 110 | 121 |
| Positive return | 30 | 110 | 121 |
| Exactly capital | |||
| Loss | |||
| Average annual return | 10.4 | 9.74 | 9.35 |
Level Autocalls showed strong performance through the ten year study. With 802 maturities in the 5 year and 1175 in the 10 year periods, they were the second largest contributor to maturities behind the Step Down category. Most Level Autocalls had already matured before the end of 2025, especially those issued in 2020-2021. The ones reaching final maturity in 2025 still delivered high positive return rates with only a small handful showing losses.
| Name | Last year | Last 5 years | Last 10 years |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of maturities | 162 | 802 | 1175 |
| Positive return | 162 | 791 | 1155 |
| Exactly capital | 10 | 16 | |
| Loss | 1 | 4 | |
| Average annual return | 8.69 | 8.23 | 8.17 |
Some older defensive products, maturing between December 2015 and December 2020 suffered losses given the severe bear market conditions under Covid, despite the products’ defensive characteristics.
| Name | Last year | Last 5 years | Last 10 years |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of maturities | 41 | 157 | 336 |
| Positive return | 41 | 157 | 305 |
| Exactly capital | 22 | ||
| Loss | 9 | ||
| Average annual return | 7.62 | 7.29 | 6.41 |
Step Down showed the largest number of outstanding maturities with over 1258 for the 5-year period and 1633 for the 10-year period. This reflects their dominance in the market over this period. Their behaviour in 2025 was consistent with their design with a large number of outstanding products able to mature successfully given the lower Autocall levels. Only two such products suffered capital loss.
| Name | Last year | Last 5 years | Last 10 years |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of maturities | 277 | 1258 | 1633 |
| Positive return | 277 | 1256 | 1626 |
| Exactly capital | 1 | 5 | |
| Loss | 1 | 2 | |
| Average annual return | 7.61 | 6.97 | 7.09 |
Overall, the highest return rates were achieved by Hurdle Autocalls (9.35% over the last 10 years) followed by Level Autocalls (8.17%). This is because in broadly upward markets higher risk Autocalls will show higher returns. Defensive and Step Down Autocalls returned significantly less given their lower risk profile.
In conclusion 2025 continued the theme in recent years. Issuance reached 866 products and Autocalls continued to dominate performance outcomes. Overall, 2025 reinforced the resilience of the Autocall design and the value of having a variety of Autocall structures tailored to different risk profiles and market conditions.
Tags: Structured EdgeImage courtesy of: Shashank Sahay / unsplash.com









